Autonomy versus paternalism in Latin America.
نویسندگان
چکیده
In this paper, Dr. Cherny beautifully reviews how to balance the patient's right to be adequately informed about his or her disease with the powerful cultural beliefs held in many parts of the world. This is certainly one of the most difficult tasks in the patient-oncologist relationship. The disclosure of prognostic information to terminally ill patients has emerged within the last 15 years as an important issue, given the greater demands for patient involvement in medical decision making, particularly in the United States.[1] With the evolving emphasis on individual autonomy and freedom, medical paternalism is no longer unquestioningly accepted by society as the principal mode of decision making in health care.[2]
منابع مشابه
Relational conceptions of paternalism: a way to rebut nanny-state accusations and evaluate public health interventions.
OBJECTIVES 'Nanny-state' accusations can function as powerful rhetorical weapons against interventions intended to promote public health. Public health advocates often lack effective rebuttals to these criticisms. Nanny-state accusations are largely accusations of paternalism. They conjure up emotive concern about undue governmental interference undermining peoples' autonomy. But autonomy can b...
متن کاملControversies in oncologist-patient communication: a nuanced approach to autonomy, culture, and paternalism.
Difficult dialogues with patients facing life-changing decisions are an intrinsic part of oncologic practice and a major source of stress. Having a sophisticated approach to the concepts of autonomy, paternalism, and culture can help in addressing difficult dilemmas that arise around the issues of disclosure and decision making. This article addresses some of the most common major challenges in...
متن کاملWhen open-ended questions don't work: the role of palliative paternalism in difficult medical decisions.
Abstract The balance between patient autonomy and medical paternalism must be reexamined. The tension between autonomy and paternalism is both an ethical and practical issue. Autonomy is the current gold standard approach to patient communication and has grown to the point that patient preference dictates care, even when their choices are not possible or are medically nonbeneficial. Furthermore...
متن کاملA defence of medical paternalism : A defence of inedical paternalismn : maximising patients ' autonomy
All illness represents a state ofdiminished autonomy and therefore the doctor-patient relationship necessarily and justifiably involves a degree ofmedical paternalism argues the author, an American medical student. In a broadranging paper he discusses the concepts ofautonomy and paternalism in the context of the doctor-patient relationship. Given the necessary diminution ofautonomy which illnes...
متن کاملPaternalism versus autonomy: medical opinion and ethical questions in the treatment of defective neonates.
The paternalistic view that decisions on whether to treat defective newborns are best made by physicians is rejected. It is contended that society should serve as the infant's protector by providing legal standards to govern treatment decisions.
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Oncology
دوره 26 1 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2012